Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200002031326.IAA22002@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Chris <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-sql
> > Let me add that to the TODO list.
> 
> Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and
> more useful information.

Yes, we probably should do that, but I bet some interfaces us it. 
Comments?

Actually, looks like only pg_dump uses it, so maybe we would be OK.
Maybe 7.0 is a good time to fix this.

> 
> > > >Could you do that for relhassubclass?
> > >
> > > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on
> > > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory.
> > 
> > Yes, that would work.  Seems hasindex has problems.
> 
> ************
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Next
From: "Mark Hollomon"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL