Re: [HACKERS] TODO item - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
Date
Msg-id 200002091617.LAA22751@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] TODO item  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Thinking about a little bit more, I have come across yet another
> possible solution. It is actually *very* simple. Details as follows.
> 
> In xact.c:RecordTransactionCommit() there are two FlushBufferPool
> calls. One is for relation files and the other is for pg_log. I add
> sync() right after these FlushBufferPool. It will force any pending
> kernel buffers physically be written onto disk, thus should guarantee
> the ACID of the transaction (see attached code fragment).

Interesting idea.  I had proposed this solution long ago.  My idea was
to buffer pg_log writes every 30 seconds.  Every 30 seconds, do a sync,
then write/sync pg_log.  Seemed like a good solution at the time, but
Vadim didn't like it.  I think he prefered to do logging, but honestly,
it was over a year ago, and we could have been benefiting from it all
this time.

Second, I had another idea.  What if we fsync()'ed a file descriptor
only when we were writing the _last_ dirty buffer for that file.  Seems
in many cases this would be a win.  I just don't know how hard that is
to figure out.  Seems there is no need to fsync() if we still have dirty
buffers around.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Small update for WinNT port
Next
From: FixerRM@aol.com
Date:
Subject: jdbc and sequences --RM