Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
Date
Msg-id m12PKVK-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
List pgsql-hackers
> > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> > wouldn't have to skip over them.  In outfuncs.c, we could either
> > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.
   Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs)
Next
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well