Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
Date
Msg-id 200002272349.SAA10668@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to A further thought on rule string size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
> Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> wouldn't have to skip over them.  In outfuncs.c, we could either
> have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
> 
> Comments?

If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Is anyone working on pg_dump?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN