Re: [HACKERS] backend startup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] backend startup
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000209075427.0109c140@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to backend startup  (Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 05:50 PM 2/9/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
>Is there any particular reason why a backend has to be started by the
>postmaster unless it is the only backend running (in debug mode) ?
>
>I'm thinking here that
>
>(a) It would be more convenient to debug if you didn't have to shut down
>the postmaster to run gdb postgres and...
>
>(b) If that were the case you be part-way to implementing a
>single-process database option like some databases have.

I can see where (a) is true, but who really cares about (b) any
more?  NT, BSD, or Linux on a several hundred dollar PC has no problem
with dozens of processes...




- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] minor bug...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Small update for WinNT port