Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems
Date
Msg-id 200002161639.LAA02621@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems  (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Actually, the point of including c.h (plus postgres_ext.h) rather than
> postgres.h was to not have access to the backend internal stuff, so as to
> keep the separation clean. But it doesn't really matter to me. Also, on my
> system at least, there were no redundant includes. I actually went through
> each library call and put in exactly the includes the man page mentioned.

Yes, I suspected that was your purpose.  I couldn't find any other areas
where c.h was used, so I figured I may as well make it standard, and if
we want to make it separate, we would have to do most of bin and
interfaces, and that would be a separate job.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parser changes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres meets InterBase (ZDNet)