Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Date
Msg-id 200002241544.KAA18408@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
List pgsql-hackers
> Using -f would work if you hadn't already overloaded it with another
> meaning; but as you say I don't much want to add line numbers to all
> the regress test expected outputs.  (That would mean that
> adding/deleting lines in a test would create many bogus differences
> further down in its output, which would be a pain in the neck for the
> initial hand-validation of the changed output.)
> 
> So I vote for a switch that suppresses reading psqlrc ...
> 

Yes, but are there cases where we would want psqlrc values set?  Should
we specifically set all the variables ourselves on startup, just
over-riding what is in psqlrc?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.0beta1 on Win32