Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000214165448.01737ec0@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Solution for LIMIT cost estimation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 10:30 AM 2/15/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:

>It's a logical fact that the existance of "offset", automatically
>implies
>ordering, no matter how many SQL textbooks you quote.

Chris, that is your opinion and judging from the responses of other
folks on this list, it appears to be very much a minority opinion.

Minority of one, as a matter of fact.  There has been a parade
of posts disagreeing with your opinion.

Why not give up and get on with your life before I get tired of
being polite?  I'm *much* more stubborn than you are, particularly
when I'm right.




- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation