Re: [HACKERS] ONLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris
Subject Re: [HACKERS] ONLY
Date
Msg-id 389E857E.E96862AB@bitmead.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] ONLY  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] ONLY
List pgsql-hackers
Don Baccus wrote:

> It's not ALL that bad, my earlier comments were 
> partly tongue in cheek.

<grumble> I think they're pretty bad. I did start reading from the
beginning, even reading the definitions and there are many things that
are not clear to me.

If you think it's not too bad, do you care to comment on the "ONLY"
situation?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug?
Next
From: "Ansley, Michael"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] ONLY