Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Taral
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.10.10002031049570.6100-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Maintaining an accurate count of descendants (or indexes for that
> matter) would be expensive; in particular, it'd create severe
> concurrency problems.

What about fixing these things on VACUUM then?

Taral



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] INSTALL doc correction ...
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL