Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000228163607.00ecb4f0@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 02:04 AM 2/29/00 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:

>IIRC, the same behaviour plagued the old foreign key implementation 
>in contrib, which was why it was refused for a long time to be 
>integrated.
>
>I hope that at least the foreig keys don't do it anymore.

It shouldn't because they're implemented via triggers after all the
work is done.  In other words, the implementation might have bugs
but the bugs should be different :)



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Next
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)