Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 2000-01-13, Tom Lane mentioned:
>> I have a feeling we will have to revert this change...
> I'd ask you to reconsider.
If you found a solution to the %m issue, I'm a happy camper. I thought
all the too-many-arguments gripes were because of %m, but evidently
I was mistaken. Good work!
regards, tom lane