Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes
Date
Msg-id 200001050456.XAA04152@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to rename timestamp to datetime because
> > datetime is the ANSI name?  Just asking.
> 
> timestamp is the SQL92 name for the date+time data type. datetime was
> a name concocted by me to avoid conflicting with other possible
> standard names when I first implemented the "new and improved"
> date/time types. Am I missing something in my recollection??

I had refered to datetime in my book, thinking that was the standard
name.  I now see it is TIMESTAMP.  Good thing someone asked about this.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Y2K glitch in pgsql mail list archives