Re: [HACKERS] flex - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] flex
Date
Msg-id 20104.948091288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] flex  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>>> flex has a lexer-specific library (libfl.a), but as far as I can tell
>>>> our scanners don't call it.  In fact our build process has no provision
>>>> for adding -lfl to the link, which I used to think was an oversight, but
>>>> now it's starting to seem like a good idea.  We could ship scan.c et al
>>>> in the same way we handle the yacc/bison output files, and it should
>>>> work everywhere.

> This puzzles me a bit still, but it seems to work.

I suppose that libfl.a is only needed to support some flex features that
we don't use --- but I haven't bothered to dig in and find out what.


Thanks for taking care of that task; it'd been hanging around on the
"good ideas to get to someday" list for quite a while.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape
Next
From: Christof Petig
Date:
Subject: external data sources (e.g. a second RDBMS)