Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Date
Msg-id 19745.948003958@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I have applied a patch for this one.

Right, you saw the parser_typecast mistake.  But the problem of doing
it properly for non-constant input to the CAST is still open.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST