Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Date
Msg-id 200001160644.BAA09781@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have applied a patch for this one.
> 
> Right, you saw the parser_typecast mistake.  But the problem of doing
> it properly for non-constant input to the CAST is still open.
> 

Yes, and constants with cases in SELECT INTO are broken too.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Next
From: Kristofer Munn
Date:
Subject: Temp Tables: Trying to delete a reldesc...