Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak - Zakkr
Subject Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000113165409.30099A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> > I have a question... How PG parser select (build-in) function?
> > Check parser function's arguments datetypes only or check returns value 
> > datetype too (for function searching in system cache ..etc)?
> 
> The argument types have to be different.  In general, the parser
> doesn't *know* what the return type of the function is; it has to
> discover that by looking up the function.  So you can't have two
> functions of the same name unless they differ in number and/or type
> of arguments.
Well, we must use the numeric version of to_number() only and parser 
must cast from numeric itself (but IMHO it is not effective convert in 
to_number() string to numeric and in parser convert numeric to other
datetype. But if it not possible.. :-(
Thank!
                    Karel



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: initdb (Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN