Re: Date/time type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Date/time type
Date
Msg-id 3887CE78.5ACBF3EE@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Date/time type  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> ... I was thinking along the lines of
> If you want me to help writing something like this up, tell me.

Well, looks like you just did. If you want to plop it into sgml and
commit it, that would be great. Otherwise, I'll steal it and do it
sometime soon ;)

> This is by no means to bash the documentation writers, I just like the
> idea of supporting standard SQL over Postgres'isms where both are
> equivalent. See also CAST vs ::, etc.

Right, I'm happy going through the docs and emphasizing SQL92 vs older
"Pig-isms" for equivalent features. For 7.0, I'd also like to go
through and reorganize the User's Guide, but I'm not sure if I'll get
time...
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates
Next
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates