Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up
Date
Msg-id 11546.947732731@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up
Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up
List pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> I have a plan to clean up the usage of putenv(), getenv() in libpq+MB
> configuration. This needs some interface changes with libpq in the
> frontend side. I'm not sure this is visible to end users or not, and I
> would like to hear from hackes.

I think it is a very good idea to remove getenv() from PQmblen().
getenv() is rather slow, at least on the machines I use, and having
to do it for each character processed is a huge performance hit.

PQmblen is exported by libpq (psql is an example of an application
that uses it).  So very possibly, changing it would break a few client
applications.  A possible answer is to leave PQmblen alone, and invent
a new routine with a different name that looks at PGconn.  We could
deprecate PQmblen and delete it after a few releases.  I'm not sure
if this is worth the trouble or not --- maybe it's OK to make a non-
compatible change to PQmblen.

> (1) While establishing a connection, if the environment variable
> PGCLIENTENCODING is not set, libpq asks the backend what the encoding
> for the database is.

> Above implementation has a design flaw since it is not multithread-safe.

You would still do one getenv() during connection setup, right, to see
if PGCLIENTENCODING is set?  If you don't, that would be a significant
change in behavior that might make a lot of people unhappy.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated