Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc"
Date
Msg-id 25283.946268363@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> And that'll still crash and burn for multicolumn indexes.

Not to mention functional indexes, which typically store values that
don't appear in the referenced tuple at all.

Basically, indexes have to have their own toasters.  There's no other
way.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc"
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc"