Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on
Date
Msg-id m11zyG4-0003kIC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> Dare I suggest
> that we should declare feature freeze *now*, and concentrate on bug
> fixes only for the next six weeks?  If not, what features are on the
> near horizon?

    Only if the implementation of the temp file buffered deferred
    trigger event queue isn't considered a feature, and  after  I
    committed  the  catalog  changes  I  need  to go on with LONG
    quietly.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches)
Next
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on