> > The difference in the copyright notice patch is just extending the 1994 -
> > 1999 to 2000 and aligning the quotes.
> I believe that at one point we came to a sort-of conclusion that this
> whole deal is (C) UCB until 1995(6?) and (C) PostgreSQL Global Development
> Group 1996-present. Don't give intellectual property to people that didn't
> do anything.
Yes, this is the way we should be annotating Postgres afaik. UCB would
be aghast to find that they need to defend themselves against all of
the changes in the last three years :)
Do we now have things in the code tree which do not carry two
copyrights, or just the Postgres Dev Group copyright plus a reference
to the full text in the docs?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
