Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.20.9912120121530.6044-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
List pgsql-hackers
On 1999-12-11, Tom Lane mentioned:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we
> >> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll
> >> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy
> >> prospects.
> 
> Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the
> objects in the database in OID order?

Wow, great idea! That might actually solve all (well, most) pg_dump
related problems once and for all. Of course how you get all objects in
the database in oid order is to be determined.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG)