Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.20.9912142100270.388-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1999-12-14, Thomas Lockhart mentioned:

> afaik we support the type names defined in SQL92 (like smallint),
> historical names in Postgres, and some extensions. What more do we
> need?

We need to move the standard names up in the docs and the historical ones
down. I guess what you're doing with the date/time types would also be a
good idea.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Hagerty
Date:
Subject: Backend core dump, Please help, Urgent!
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes