Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ed Loehr
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 384D4D3A.2C2C3DF5@austin.rr.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kyle Bateman wrote:

> Now again, these are just suggestions, but I think the following are good ideas:
>
> 3. Do not disclose these bids to the public

> 4. Do not disclose the received pledges to date to the public

I'm curious about your rationale for 3 and 4.  Why not disclose bid amounts (not bidders) and
received pledge amounts (not pledgers) to the public prior to the work being completed?  What
do you think would happen?

Ed Loehr





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce)