Tom Lane wrote:
> wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>
> > Uh,
> > who did the latter one?
>
> > So I assume it's not implemented in the form I outlined - the
> > subselecting range table entry. I'll take a look at it the
> > next days and maybe complain about that change if it
> > interferes with the needs of the rule system to make
> > aggregate, distinct, group by, sort by and all the other
> > (long wanted) view stuff possible.
>
> I don't believe this has anything to do with subselects as range
> table entries. That facility will be quite separate from subselects
> in expressions, no?
Now that you say it...
Yes, they are separate. They don't interfere.
Thank's for the *slap* - sometimes I need that :-).
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
