Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Date
Msg-id 199911190058.TAA19713@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> * Since no one has picked up on my idea to run the tests directly on the
> >> backend, I will keep reiterating this idea until someone shuts me up
> 
> > Running the backend standalone does not use locking with other backends,
> > so it is dangerous.
> 
> It wouldn't be particularly "dangerous" if we assume that no one else is
> accessing the regression database.  What it *would* be is less useful at
> catching problems.  Standalone mode wouldn't test the cross-backend
> interlocking code at all.

Any modifications to shared pg_ tables would be a problem.  Also, pg_log
and pg_variable locking is not happening in there either, is it?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: pg version date file
Next
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests