Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits
Date
Msg-id 199910201741.NAA12484@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits  (Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits  (Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
>    AFAICT, the last remaining textual length limits in the backend are a
>    couple of fixed-size buffers in rewriteDefine.c and array support.
>    In the next few days (probably this weekend) I intend to fix that code
>    and then remove all #define constants that have anything to do with
>    string length limits.  (Tentative hit list is attached.)
> 
> Great!
> 
> Jan, does this mean that we can also lose the "rewrite string too big"
> problem with rules?
> 
> That would be a huge win.


No.  We have to have long tuples.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?]
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Book on web site