Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Date
Msg-id 22606.940946519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Sounds good.  My only question is whether people need backward
> compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
> interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?

I think we could drop it after a decent interval, but I don't see any
reason to be in a hurry.  I do think that we'll get complaints if 7.0
doesn't have any backward compatibility for existing user functions.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fernando Schapachnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1
Next
From: saad
Date:
Subject: what the hell telnet is