Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Date
Msg-id 199910091020.GAA05654@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type  (Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
List pgsql-hackers
> 4. Now that I've got the functionality, can somebody give me a rough
> roadmap to what I need to change to turn this into a proper postgres
> type? As far as I can see I need to assign oid's to it in pg_type.h and
> I'll have to have a look at the parser to get it to recognise the types.
> It would be a big help though if somebody could tell me what else needs
> to change.

I can integrate the type for you into the include/catalog files if
everyone agrees they want it as a standard type and not an contrib type.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Adriaan Joubert
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments