RE: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ansley, Michael
Subject RE: [HACKERS] psql Week 1
Date
Msg-id 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C11E@S-NATH-EXCH2
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Perhaps an option for the command:
\connect dbname /nofail
or something

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew N. Dodd [mailto:winter@jurai.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 6:59 AM
>> To: Peter Eisentraut
>> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > * when \connect fails, it now keeps the previous 
>> connection (formerly
>> >   aborted program)
>> 
>> This is bad.
>> 
>> Consider some process that connects to various DBs and does 
>> stuff like
>> drop foo.
>> 
>> If connect fails assume that the user no longer wanted to be 
>> connected to
>> the old connection.
>> 
>> -- 
>> | Matthew N. Dodd  | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | 
>> FreeBSD/NetBSD  |
>> | winter@jurai.net |       2 x '84 Volvo 245DL        | 
>> ix86,sparc,pmax |
>> | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent  | 
>> ISO8802.5 4ever |
>> 
>> 
>> ************
>> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
Date:
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1