>
> [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > >
> > > > As I was afraid,2 tables of a same name could be made.
> > > > After a short investigating,I found that system indexes are
> > > > never unique indexes.
> > > > Why ?
> > > > Without duplicate index check,it's very difficult to prevent
> > > > objects from having same name.
> > >
> > > They certainly should be unique.
> > >
> >
> > All should be unique ?
> > I don't know system indexes well.
>
> Not sure. I don't remember which ones. I can take a look when I add
> more indexes for 7.0.
Don't remember if really or what, but wasn't there some
problem with cached system relations, unique indices and
concurrency?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
