Re: AW: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: AW: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9910211108470.314-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour?  (Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 wrote:

> >     select distinct f1 from t1 order by f2;
> > 
> > Returned the following message under Oracle8 on NT:
> >     ORA-01791: not a SELECTed expression
> 
> Informix:    309: ORDER BY column (f2) must be in SELECT list. 

The version of sybase I tried earlier was 4.9.2.  I just tried it
again on 11.5 -- same thing.

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH   email: vev@michvhf.com   flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h>       Have you
seenhttp://www.pop4.net?       Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com      Online Giftshop
Superstore   http://www.cloudninegifts.com
 
==========================================================================





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
Date:
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour?
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book