Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date
Msg-id 199910061439.KAA10225@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Next question is should we emit a NOTICE or just silently do it?
> (For that matter, should we go so far as to push the HAVING condition
> over to become part of WHERE when it has no agg?  Then the speed issue
> goes away.)  I kind of like emitting a NOTICE on the grounds of helping
> to educate users about the difference between WHERE and HAVING, but
> maybe people would just see it as obnoxious.

That is a tough call.  My personal vote is that HAVING is misunderstood
enough to emit a warning.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error?