Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9910120117260.404-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > Yes, we have discussed this, and will add it to the TODO list.
> > > > can the commands createuser and destroyuser be renamed to
> > > > pg_createuser and pg_destroyuser (as pg_dump) adding soft links to
> > > > preserve backwards compatibility (declaring previous commands
> > > > deprecated) ?
> > > > the same can be done for createdb and destroydb ...
> > 
> > I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> > underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> > apocalypse ;)
> 
> But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?

Oh, and, IMHO...remove, don't create symlinks...its a major release, we
don't have to maintain backwards compatability...we aren't mIcrosoft, eh?
:)

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?))