> I don't have a better idea right at the moment. I'm open to the idea
> that VACUUM should compute more or different statistics, though ---
> as long as it doesn't slow things down too much. (How much is too much
> would probably depend on how much win the new stats would provide for
> normal query-planning. For example, I'd resist making two passes over
> the table during VACUUM ANALYZE, but I wouldn't rule it out completely;
> you could sell me on it if the advantages were great enough.)
>
> Hey, you guys are the researchers ... give us a better approach to
> keeping table statistics ;-)
Yes, I am open to better ideas. The current code does 2-value columns,
and unique columns perfectly. The other distributions it gets only
approximate answers, but for a one-pass system, that's the best I could
do.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
