Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release
Date
Msg-id m11Zcq6-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Features for next release  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart     wrote:

>
> Hmm. I see a problem coming up for myself :(
>
> I'm working on JOIN syntax and (hopefully) OUTER JOIN capabilities for
> the next release. That will take a lot of time afaik. We also have
> lots of great new features (almost certainly) coming up, such as WAL
> and RI. Lots of stuff, and taken together it should lead to a v7.0
> release.

    What  I  actually  see  when starting/stopping the postmaster
    lets me think that Vadim alread has the WAL target in  sight.

    And for RI I can say that we'll have at least FOREIGN KEY for
    MATCH FULL without PENDANT  in  the  next  release.  The  key
    features  are  in place and there's plenty of time left to do
    all the stuff around.

>
> However! I've been waiting for v7.0 to do internal remapping of the
> datetime types (and possibly other types; I'm not remembering right
> now) so that the 4-byte TIMESTAMP becomes, internally, what is
> currently DATETIME and so that the current DATETIME becomes a synonym
> for TIMESTAMP. If we are releasing v7.0 rather than v6.6, then I
> should work on that now to ensure it is completed. If we might release
> as v6.6, I should continue to work on OUTER JOIN, since the type
> changes shouldn't go in yet.
>
> Any opinions/comments on the right path to take? With code changes and
> docs changes I would think that the datetime stuff is two or a few
> weeks work with my off-work time, which I suppose wouldn't impace a
> release schedule too much...

    Break TIMESTAMP right now. IMHO it would  be  THE  reason  (a
    functional  incompatibility  to v6.5) we where looking for to
    be 100% sure the next release must be v7.0.

    I clearly vote for v7.0 - even if I personally hoped we would
    have   a   little  chance  to  produce  the  ultimate  devils
    PostgreSQL-v6.6.6 someday.

    Apropos devil: tomorrow Braunschweig Lions vs.  Hamburg  Blue
    Devils here in Hamburg - German bowl! Go Devils go!


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion