RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Mount
Subject RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release
Date
Msg-id 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C25E6C8@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
I also have a slight feeling that 6.5.2 is missing bits of the current
JDBC source. I'm not certain (won't be able to check until tonight), but
I think this is the case.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org]
Sent: 12 October 1999 15:44
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Thomas Lockhart; Postgres Hackers List
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release 


On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> >> Bruce, you asked for a v6.5.3 to be released...anything outstanding
that
> >> should prevent me from doing that tomorrow afternoon?  
> 
> > Not that I know of.  I was waiting to see if we could come up with
other
> > patches, but I don't think that is going to happen anytime soon.
> 
> On the other hand, is there a reason to be in a rush to put out 6.5.3?
> I didn't think we had many important changes from 6.5.2 yet.

v6.5.3, I believe, was because PgAccess somehow got removed in v6.5.2 :(


Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick:
Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary:
scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


************


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directories