> > Yes, you have the crux of the issue. I wrote it because it was the best
> > thing I could think of, but it is non-optimimal. Because all the
> > optimal solutions seemed too slow to me, I couldn't think of a better
> > one.
>
> Thank you, Tom and Bruce.
> This is not a good news for us :-(. In any case, is 1/disbursion the
> best estimate we can have by now, even if not optimal?
That is the best one maintained by the database.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
