Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments
Date
Msg-id 199910062222.SAA23693@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql and comments  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Anyway, I'm going to end up rewriting that parser anyway, so that will be
> taken care of. I was almost about to use flex but the Windows crowd
> probably wouldn't find that too funny. (The Windows crowd won't find this
> thing funny anyway, since I have no clue what #ifdef's I need for that.
> Someone else will have to do a looong compile&fix session.)
> 
> The question I have though is, is there a reason, besides efficiency, that
> psql doesn't just send the comment to the backend with the query? The
> backend does accept comments last time I checked. Perhaps someone will one
> day write something that makes some use of those comments on the backend
> (thus conflicting with the very definition of "comment", but maybe a
> logger) and it would remove some load out of psql.

Remove it.  Send it to the backend.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psql and comments
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: WAL Bootstrap/Startup/Shutdown committed...