Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857
Date
Msg-id 29576.941151492@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Oh, I defined it in that file, it's used in psql. Unfortunately, it seems
> to be used internally in readline as well. In now figured out that this
> causes problems only with static linking, but not dynamic. I'm no expert
> on linking, does anyone have an idea or do I have to make up a different
> name?

Pick another name --- you're just *asking* for trouble with that one.
People tend to invent macros with names like that...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brian Ristuccia
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd)