Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits
Date
Msg-id 13724.940445266@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits  (Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu> writes:
>> Jan, does this mean that we can also lose the "rewrite string too big"
>> problem with rules?

>    No.  We have to have long tuples.

> Darn.  Oh well, I guess this is a major step in that direction.

I'm hoping that once this is done, someone who knows the guts of the
storage managers better than I will feel motivated to work on letting
stored tuples cross block boundaries.  (Paging Vadim...)  That seems
to be the last piece of the puzzle.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jimmie Houchin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] book status
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Perl Module