Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9910061013360.11236-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> > Maybe we should support the HAVING without aggregates.  What do others
> > think?
> 
> If we are the only one that doesn't, it just makes it harder for those
> moving from Oracle/Informix/etc if they happen to be using such queries...

I just tried it on a very old Sybase (ver 4 something, before ODBC was
available for it) and it works on that.  

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH   email: vev@michvhf.com   flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h>       Have you
seenhttp://www.pop4.net?       Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com      Online Giftshop
Superstore   http://www.cloudninegifts.com
 
==========================================================================





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error?
Next
From: "Ansley, Michael"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql c omparison