Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date
Msg-id 199910061345.JAA08594@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > I will try the patch of bruce for the comment part. It shouldn't be the 
> > > way that the perl module is stripping the comments of the querie 
> > > but it is possible and if it is possible it will be a bug in the DBD 
> > > postgresql perl module.
> > 
> > Maybe we should support the HAVING without aggregates.  What do others
> > think?
> 
> If we are the only one that doesn't, it just makes it harder for those
> moving from Oracle/Informix/etc if they happen to be using such queries...
> 
> How hard would it be to implement?

Not hard.  I will add it to the TODO list.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison