Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 August 1998

00:13 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working Thomas G. Lockhart
00:21 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working Vince Vielhaber
04:14 Re: AW: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Bruce Momjian
09:09 Re: [HACKERS] Dropping tables... Vadim Mikheev
09:55 OR clause - check code Bruce Momjian
10:54 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause - check code Vadim Mikheev
11:00 OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian
11:15 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Vadim Mikheev
12:43 6.4 Aggregate Bug David Hartwig
13:06 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Edmund Mergl
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Thomas G. Lockhart
14:30 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources The Hermit Hacker
15:12 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Vadim Mikheev
15:53 Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Peter T Mount
16:30 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause - check code Bruce Momjian
16:39 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian
18:58 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Tom Lane
19:13 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Bruce Momjian
20:39 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Bruce Momjian
20:47 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Oleg Bartunov
21:37 OR clause indexing installed Bruce Momjian
21:45 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Peter T Mount
21:55 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Bruce Momjian
22:11 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Bruce Momjian
22:52 MULTIBYE typo ? Oleg Bartunov
22:58 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug David Hartwig
23:17 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources The Hermit Hacker
23:18 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources The Hermit Hacker
23:19 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources The Hermit Hacker
23:22 Re: [HACKERS] MULTIBYE typo ? Bruce Momjian

2 August 1998

00:20 Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Tom Lane
00:27 Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Tom Lane
01:15 SPI_connect always fails. Brett McCormick
01:26 follow up Re: [HACKERS] SPI_connect always fails. Brett McCormick
03:14 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Thomas G. Lockhart
08:27 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Peter T Mount
08:54 initdb problems Peter T Mount
08:57 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources ernst.molitor@uni-bonn.de
10:43 Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Maarten Boekhold
12:28 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] MULTIBYE typo ? t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
12:40 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Thomas G. Lockhart
12:49 Re: follow up Re: [HACKERS] SPI_connect always fails. Thomas G. Lockhart
18:55 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Michael Graff
21:40 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Tom Lane
22:28 TODO item: make pg_shadow updates more robust Tom Lane
23:26 indexes and floats Vince Vielhaber
23:42 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug David Hartwig

3 August 1998

01:03 is this allowed here-- I am developing an interface to postgresql Mark Nielsen
01:40 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Vadim Mikheev
02:00 won't post here anymore, foudn better Mark Nielsen
04:09 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
04:18 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: make pg_shadow updates more robust Thomas G. Lockhart
04:25 Re: Dropping tables... Dr. Michael Meskes
04:50 New color flowchart Bruce Momjian
04:59 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: make pg_shadow updates more robust Bruce Momjian
05:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Dropping tables... Vadim Mikheev
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian
05:22 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Vadim Mikheev
05:31 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Maarten Boekhold
05:41 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Maarten Boekhold
05:48 Re: [HACKERS] is this allowed here-- I am developing an interface to postgresql The Hermit Hacker
06:14 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: make pg_shadow updates more robust Maarten Boekhold
10:57 AW: [HACKERS] Dropping tables... Andreas Zeugswetter
11:40 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vince Vielhaber
11:44 number of opened files ? Oleg Bartunov
11:48 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Oleg Bartunov
12:06 Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 pg_dump core dump bower@image.Kodak.COM (J Christopher Bower)
12:27 ... Oleg Bartunov
13:01 (no subject) fcheese
13:21 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
13:27 Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 pg_dump core dump Thomas G. Lockhart
15:30 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian
16:00 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian
16:08 Re: [HACKERS] is this allowed here-- I am developing an interface to postgresql darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
16:28 Bug in gram.y? Dr. Michael Meskes
17:27 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? Bruce Momjian
18:10 Text indexes... Vince Vielhaber
19:29 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Peter T Mount
21:54 PostgreSQL catalogues: finding the primary key Roland Roberts

4 August 1998

01:03 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? Thomas G. Lockhart
01:32 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? t-ishii@sra.co.jp
02:46 Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system Bruce Momjian
02:51 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Tom Lane
03:37 Re: [HACKERS] number of opened files ? Tom
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
03:42 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Bruce Momjian
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vadim Mikheev
03:44 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Bruce Momjian
03:51 EXPLAIN VERBOSE Bruce Momjian
09:18 How do I construct a varlena? Oliver Elphick
13:29 Re: [HACKERS] How do I construct a varlena? Maarten Boekhold
13:49 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Tom Lane
14:04 EXPLAIN VERBOSE Bruce Momjian
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vince Vielhaber
15:30 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
16:10 Standards question Dr. Michael Meskes
16:10 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? Dr. Michael Meskes
16:30 Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/utils lsyscache.h' Bruce Momjian
16:37 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? Bruce Momjian
18:52 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes David Hartwig
20:07 Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes Bruce Momjian

5 August 1998

00:18 OR clause status Bruce Momjian
00:32 Re: [HACKERS] Standards question Thomas G. Lockhart
01:00 Re: [HACKERS] Standards question Roland Roberts
03:30 Standards question Dr. Michael Meskes
11:47 AW: [HACKERS] Standards question Andreas Zeugswetter
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status David Hartwig
13:24 SPI procedure for removing large objects Sergey E. Levov
13:45 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Tom Lane
13:52 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Tom Lane
14:01 Broken source tree Thomas G. Lockhart
14:04 UNSUBSCRIBE! fcheese
14:22 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
14:35 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
14:41 Don't forget about Groups Jackson, DeJuan
14:42 Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree Thomas G. Lockhart
15:30 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Tom Lane
15:57 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Bruce Momjian
15:59 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Bruce Momjian
16:09 Re: [HACKERS] Don't forget about Groups Bruce Momjian
16:14 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Bruce Momjian
17:04 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
17:04 Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree Peter T Mount
18:06 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects David Hartwig
18:32 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Bruce Momjian
18:55 RE: [HACKERS] Don't forget about Groups Jackson, DeJuan
19:16 RE: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Jackson, DeJuan
20:06 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
20:06 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
20:16 CVS and the backend Peter T Mount
21:00 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Bruce Momjian
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Bruce Momjian
21:36 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects David Hartwig
21:36 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects David Hartwig

6 August 1998

00:37 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Tom Lane
01:07 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Bruce Momjian
01:35 WHERE xmin = 9999 David Hartwig
03:00 Large objects names Bruce Momjian
03:03 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Thomas G. Lockhart
03:07 How do I find the table that an oid belongs to Roland Roberts
03:26 Declare Cursor question again Dr. Michael Meskes
03:26 Re: [HACKERS] Standards question Dr. Michael Meskes
03:35 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Bruce Momjian
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree t-ishii@sra.co.jp
03:45 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend t-ishii@sra.co.jp
04:10 Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree Bruce Momjian
04:11 Large objects Bruce Momjian
04:23 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects Vadim Mikheev
04:36 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount
04:47 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
04:49 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
04:52 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
05:00 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names Bruce Momjian
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Thomas G. Lockhart
05:06 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount
05:06 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names Peter T Mount
05:10 Re: [HACKERS] Declare Cursor question again Thomas G. Lockhart
05:36 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vadim Mikheev
07:47 AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names Andreas Zeugswetter
07:53 AW: [HACKERS] Declare Cursor question again Andreas Zeugswetter
08:16 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Sergey E. Levov
08:25 Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree t-ishii@sra.co.jp
12:39 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names David Hartwig
14:35 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names Bruce Momjian
14:35 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names Bruce Momjian
14:37 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Bruce Momjian
15:00 current CVS tree Bruce Momjian
15:03 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names Bruce Momjian
15:06 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Bruce Momjian
17:42 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Brook Milligan
19:10 Re: [HACKERS] Declare Cursor question again Dr. Michael Meskes
19:10 Re: [HACKERS] Declare Cursor question again Dr. Michael Meskes
21:16 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Brett McCormick
21:30 multi-type array Brett McCormick
22:06 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names Peter T Mount
22:10 Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names Bruce Momjian
23:01 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats dg@informix.com (David Gould)

7 August 1998

01:49 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vadim Mikheev
01:56 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
02:15 Procedural language implementation questions Michael Robinson
02:19 Re: Procedural language implementation questions Bruce Momjian
02:44 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats dg@informix.com (David Gould)
03:37 Re: [HACKERS] Broken source tree Thomas G. Lockhart
03:58 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vadim Mikheev
04:06 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Bruce Momjian
04:06 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Thomas G. Lockhart
04:10 OR clause and joins Bruce Momjian
04:17 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats Vadim Mikheev
04:20 Re: Default 'now' Thomas G. Lockhart
04:59 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats dg@informix.com (David Gould)
05:07 Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats dg@informix.com (David Gould)
06:46 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Sergey E. Levov
06:58 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Default 'now' Justin Hickey
08:08 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
08:08 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount
12:32 Informix on Linux NARAYANI
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Thomas G. Lockhart
13:06 Re: Informix on Linux Thomas G. Lockhart
13:46 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Thomas G. Lockhart
15:00 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Bruce Momjian
15:25 Table permissions darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
15:31 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Bruce Momjian
17:20 thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Goran Thyni
17:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix on Linux dg@informix.com (David Gould)
19:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix on Linux Bruce Momjian

8 August 1998

05:49 Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status Thomas G. Lockhart
06:00 type coersion Bruce Momjian
06:50 re: Informix on Linux dg@informix.com (David Gould)
09:59 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount
12:21 Re: [HACKERS] re: Informix on Linux Thomas G. Lockhart
12:26 Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Thomas G. Lockhart
12:44 Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
17:19 Re: [HACKERS] re: Informix on Linux The Hermit Hacker
17:31 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Tom Lane
17:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Tom Lane
18:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Tom Lane
19:00 Re: [HACKERS] re: Informix on Linux Bruce Momjian
23:51 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Tom Lane

9 August 1998

02:30 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Bruce Momjian
03:01 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Bruce Momjian
03:58 pgindent and prototypes Bruce Momjian
12:53 Re: [HACKERS] current CVS tree Peter T Mount
14:51 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Tom Lane
16:58 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Bruce Momjian
18:46 Re: [HACKERS] How do I construct a varlena? Oliver Elphick
20:19 Re: [HACKERS] How do I find the table that an oid belongs to Roland Roberts
21:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
22:01 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Tom Lane
22:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Tom Lane
23:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
23:01 Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg Bruce Momjian
23:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian

10 August 1998

00:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
01:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
01:14 Re: [HACKERS] How do I construct a varlena? Thomas G. Lockhart
01:36 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
03:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
04:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
04:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
06:20 Re: [HACKERS] How do I construct a varlena? Maarten Boekhold
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian

11 August 1998

01:33 new findoidjoins Bruce Momjian
04:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
04:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
04:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
05:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
05:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
09:29 Indexes bug Serj
10:08 6.3.2. patch for functional indices Maarten Boekhold
11:40 Re: [HACKERS] 6.3.2. patch for functional indices The Hermit Hacker
13:12 Fix in oracle_compat.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] Fix in oracle_compat.c Bruce Momjian
14:02 Re: [GENERAL] ExecInitIndexScan ERROR? Bruce Momjian
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] Fix in oracle_compat.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:13 Re: [HACKERS] Fix in oracle_compat.c Bruce Momjian
14:18 Re: [HACKERS] Indexes bug Tom Lane
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] Fix in oracle_compat.c jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:25 Re: [HACKERS] Fix in oracle_compat.c Bruce Momjian
17:05 Re: [HACKERS] Indexes bug Bruce Momjian
17:19 Latest ecpg patch? Dr. Michael Meskes
17:31 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch? The Hermit Hacker
17:33 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch? Bruce Momjian
17:33 RE: [HACKERS] Indexes bug Jackson, DeJuan
17:38 Re: [HACKERS] Fix in oracle_compat.c Bruce Momjian
17:38 Re: [HACKERS] Indexes bug Bruce Momjian
18:31 partial index Bruce Momjian
19:37 Re: [HACKERS] Indexes bug Bruce Momjian
19:59 Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
20:13 Table permissions problem darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
20:17 Re: partial index aoki@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Paul M. Aoki)
20:38 typo in src/backend/access/index/istrat.c :attributeNumber Oleg Bartunov
21:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: partial index Bruce Momjian

12 August 1998

01:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
01:50 HELP all women were raped during the May riots in Jakarta adm@pu.go.id
02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
07:00 Re: [HACKERS] Indexes bug Serj
07:52 Rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
07:59 AW: [HACKERS] partial index Andreas Zeugswetter
08:13 AW: [HACKERS] Rule system Andreas Zeugswetter
10:01 Re: [HACKERS] 6.3.2. patch for functional indices Maarten Boekhold
10:48 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
11:47 Re: [SQL] Query based on date/time field Aleksey Dashevsky
11:52 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system Andreas Zeugswetter
13:33 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] 6.3.2. patch for functional indices t-ishii@sra.co.jp
14:38 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system Andreas Zeugswetter
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
17:11 RE: [HACKERS] Re: partial index Jackson, DeJuan
18:36 Re: [HACKERS] Re: partial index jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
18:45 Table permissions problem darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
19:30 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem Bruce Momjian

13 August 1998

00:36 Re: [HACKERS] Re: partial index Thomas G. Lockhart
01:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
02:01 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
04:00 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem Bruce Momjian
04:01 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch? Dr. Michael Meskes
04:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
08:20 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:32 tuple return from function jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
11:01 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem Bruce Momjian
11:23 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function Bruce Momjian
11:37 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
11:53 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch? The Hermit Hacker
12:42 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:54 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:22 AW: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system Andreas Zeugswetter
13:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
13:35 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem Bruce Momjian
14:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
14:17 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:25 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem Bruce Momjian
14:26 Re: [HACKERS] HELP all women were raped during the May riots in Jakarta Tom Lane
14:29 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function Bruce Momjian
14:37 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch? Dr. Michael Meskes
14:50 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:11 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:14 Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
15:20 RE: [HACKERS] tuple return from function Jackson, DeJuan
15:31 [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption George Kousi
15:41 Re: [INTERFACES] Libpq problems (not) Tom Lane
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function Bruce Momjian
18:20 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

14 August 1998

01:02 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system Vadim Mikheev
03:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
04:34 Re: [HACKERS] HELP all women were raped during the May riots in Jakarta The Hermit Hacker
06:30 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:06 Re: [HACKERS] Rule system (trigger names) Andreas Zeugswetter
08:29 non instead rule system Andreas Zeugswetter
08:42 Re: [HACKERS] Rule system (trigger names) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:57 Re: non instead rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
11:29 Define command Dr. Michael Meskes
11:29 ecpg problem Dr. Michael Meskes
13:19 Transactions Lendvary Gyorgy
13:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: non instead rule system Bruce Momjian
14:39 int8 type -- call for porting results! Thomas G. Lockhart
15:04 Re: Dropping partial index support - Dont! Hannu Krosing
16:01 Problem with parser jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:53 access Postgre database through JDBC driver from Netscape FastTrack3.0.1 machine Linda Chow
18:31 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser Bruce Momjian
18:31 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser Bruce Momjian
21:44 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

15 August 1998

00:17 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser Bruce Momjian
00:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
01:29 setheapoverride Bruce Momjian
03:57 Re: [HACKERS] setheapoverride Bruce Momjian
09:28 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg problem Maarten Boekhold
12:55 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:19 geo_ops.c is broken Tom Lane
17:11 Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:13 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Tom Lane
17:18 Regression test status (was type coersion) Tom Lane
22:39 Rules: first fix on monday jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

16 August 1998

02:12 Re: [HACKERS] geo_ops.c is broken Thomas G. Lockhart
02:29 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Thomas G. Lockhart
03:29 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) Thomas G. Lockhart
04:45 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) Thomas G. Lockhart
11:22 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Keith Parks
12:59 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Thomas G. Lockhart
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Bruce Momjian
13:34 What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
13:35 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg problem Dr. Michael Meskes
14:03 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Tom Lane
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules Tom Lane
17:00 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
17:02 Re: [HACKERS] Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules Bruce Momjian
19:21 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Keith Parks
19:22 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Keith Parks
19:57 Autoconf'd test for int64 Tom Lane
19:59 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
21:11 So what is the current documentation status? Tom Lane
21:12 Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64 Thomas G. Lockhart
21:58 Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64 The Hermit Hacker
22:01 Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Thomas G. Lockhart
22:03 Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64 Thomas G. Lockhart
22:35 Quick cut at an autoconf tutorial Tom Lane
22:38 Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64 Tom Lane
22:50 Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Tom Lane
22:54 Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64 Thomas G. Lockhart
23:17 Re: Quick cut at an autoconf tutorial Thomas G. Lockhart
23:46 Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Thomas G. Lockhart
23:51 New docs Thomas G. Lockhart

17 August 1998

00:02 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Bruce Momjian
00:05 Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Bruce Momjian
01:13 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Thomas G. Lockhart
02:00 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Bruce Momjian
02:15 Re: Quick cut at an autoconf tutorial Tom Lane
02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Quick cut at an autoconf tutorial The Hermit Hacker
03:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Quick cut at an autoconf tutorial Thomas G. Lockhart
06:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Quick cut at an autoconf tutorial dg@informix.com (David Gould)
09:19 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:35 What does "cannot extend" mean? The Hermit Hacker
12:15 Rules: first fix jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) David Hartwig
13:17 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? Tom Lane
14:26 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Thomas G. Lockhart
17:16 What does this error mean? Oliver Elphick
20:16 Re: [GENERAL] What does this error mean? Bruce Momjian
21:38 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Keith Parks
22:01 RE: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Stupor Genius
23:51 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix The Hermit Hacker

18 August 1998

00:30 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Bruce Momjian
01:47 Re: PostgreSQL logos Vadim Mikheev
01:49 Re: PostgreSQL logos Vadim Mikheev
02:35 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL logos The Hermit Hacker
03:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Vadim Mikheev
04:01 odd pg_dump output? t-ishii@sra.co.jp
04:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Thomas G. Lockhart
04:26 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Thomas G. Lockhart
06:24 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL logos Vince Vielhaber
12:48 ... ôËÁÌÉÞ áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒ
12:55 ... ôËÁÌÉÞ áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒ
13:30 urgent : postgresql question M. N. Khan
15:44 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday dg@informix.com (David Gould)
16:00 sequence creation Bruce Momjian
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! David Hartwig
16:17 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! The Hermit Hacker
16:50 Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
16:51 Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:00 RE: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Keith Parks
17:52 RE: [HACKERS] sequence creation Jackson, DeJuan
18:09 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Tom Lane
18:28 weird problem with latest cvs Oleg Bartunov
18:56 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Oleg Bartunov
19:07 Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules Keith Parks
19:15 Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
20:32 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Bruce Momjian
23:14 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix The Hermit Hacker
23:16 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! The Hermit Hacker

19 August 1998

00:42 Massive patch Bruce Momjian
00:54 Re: [HACKERS] Massive patch Bruce Momjian
01:28 Re: [HACKERS] sequence creation Thomas G. Lockhart
02:14 Re: [HACKERS] sequence creation\ darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
02:30 system caches Bruce Momjian
02:30 New Developer's FAQ item Bruce Momjian
02:30 Re: [HACKERS] sequence creation Bruce Momjian
03:28 Re: [HACKERS] New Developer's FAQ item Brook Milligan
03:32 Re: [HACKERS] New Developer's FAQ item Bruce Momjian
06:00 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Bruce Momjian
06:00 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Bruce Momjian
06:42 Re: [HACKERS] New Developer's FAQ item jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:00 AW: [HACKERS] sequence creation Andreas Zeugswetter
08:14 Re: [HACKERS] What does "cannot extend" mean? Maarten Boekhold
08:26 new MB patch and pg_type oid problem t-ishii@sra.co.jp
08:34 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:41 initb won't work Dr. Michael Meskes
08:41 struct index Dr. Michael Meskes
08:41 Need an explanation Dr. Michael Meskes
08:58 Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:08 AW: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday Andreas Zeugswetter
09:17 Rules: regression tests jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:20 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:40 Rules: 2nd patch jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:05 Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
13:51 Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem Bruce Momjian
13:52 Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work Bruce Momjian
13:52 Re: [HACKERS] struct index Bruce Momjian
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] struct index Thomas G. Lockhart
15:33 Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work Dr. Michael Meskes
16:10 Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:00 Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) Bruce Momjian
18:54 Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
19:11 Patch adding pg_rule and pg_view jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
20:17 More complete indexing for geometric types? Garrett Wollman
22:07 Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) Keith Parks

20 August 1998

00:16 Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem t-ishii@sra.co.jp
03:15 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Bruce Momjian
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] struct index Dr. Michael Meskes
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work Dr. Michael Meskes
04:44 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Bruce Momjian
07:55 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:05 DELETE statement KILL backend Sferacarta Software
10:10 Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) Keith Parks
12:58 Re: [HACKERS] Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:57 (no subject) Silvestre Dorador
14:27 Re: [HACKERS] Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) Bruce Momjian
14:33 Re: [HACKERS] Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) Bruce Momjian
15:01 Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem Bruce Momjian
16:47 initdb problem Michael Meskes
16:47 initdb problem again Michael Meskes
17:03 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem again Bruce Momjian
17:03 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Oleg Bartunov
17:28 Re: [HACKERS] weird problem with latest cvs Bruce Momjian
19:53 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem again Keith Parks
21:09 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem again Bruce Momjian
22:26 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
22:27 Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem Bruce Momjian

21 August 1998

04:30 Re: [HACKERS] Broken PostgreSQL (latest CVS) Bruce Momjian
04:30 initdb problems Bruce Momjian
13:20 Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Tom Lane
13:25 Rules for 6.4 finished jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Thomas G. Lockhart
15:06 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
15:59 Re: PostgreSQL + year 2000 The Hermit Hacker
16:09 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Keith Parks
22:07 Re: [HACKERS] New Developer's FAQ item Brook Milligan
22:08 PGDATA usage in initdb.sh Brook Milligan
22:22 Re: [HACKERS] PGDATA usage in initdb.sh Bruce Momjian
22:40 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Keith Parks

22 August 1998

00:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL + year 2000 Thomas G. Lockhart
01:32 Re: [BUGS] bug in "fetch" command? Bruce Momjian
01:32 Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export Bruce Momjian
01:32 Re: [HACKERS] SSL patch updated & pl/perl slated for 6.4 Bruce Momjian
02:31 Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Bruce Momjian
03:00 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
03:24 Re: [HACKERS] subselects & views Bruce Momjian
07:54 Re: [HACKERS] SSL patch updated & pl/perl slated for 6.4 Brett McCormick
10:07 Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Bruce Momjian
10:18 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Bruce Momjian
10:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Default 'now' Bruce Momjian
11:29 Re: [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption Bruce Momjian
11:39 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function Bruce Momjian
15:01 Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Tom Lane
15:59 Can I distinguish identically named columns in joined tables? Oliver Elphick
20:31 Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Bruce Momjian

23 August 1998

07:34 Re: [HACKERS] New Developer's FAQ item jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:30 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Michael Meskes
12:13 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Vince Vielhaber
17:18 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
18:55 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Oleg Bartunov
19:00 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects Peter T Mount
21:01 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
21:25 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
21:25 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
21:25 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser Bruce Momjian
21:26 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) Bruce Momjian
21:26 Re: [HACKERS] geo_ops.c is broken Bruce Momjian
21:26 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) Bruce Momjian
21:27 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Oleg Bartunov
21:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) Bruce Momjian
21:30 Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64 Bruce Momjian
23:21 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Hartwig
23:25 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian

24 August 1998

00:11 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results! Bruce Momjian
00:14 Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem Bruce Momjian
00:17 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: regression tests Bruce Momjian
00:19 Re: [HACKERS] struct index Bruce Momjian
00:23 Re: [HACKERS] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Bruce Momjian
00:28 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Bruce Momjian
00:30 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Bruce Momjian
00:32 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
00:33 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Bruce Momjian
00:37 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
00:52 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser Bruce Momjian
01:04 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
01:06 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Stupor Genius
01:07 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
01:08 Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
01:35 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
02:00 RE: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Stupor Genius
02:18 RE: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
02:30 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
02:51 minor problem with detecting int64 in configure t-ishii@sra.co.jp
02:54 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
03:00 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
03:00 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
03:09 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Bruce Momjian
03:14 Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Vadim Mikheev
03:16 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
03:18 Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on The Hermit Hacker
05:43 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem t-ishii@sra.co.jp
06:51 Re[2]: [GENERAL] DELETE statement KILL backend Sferacarta Software
07:19 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Peter T Mount
10:53 AW: [HACKERS] What I'm working on Andreas Zeugswetter
11:51 Re: [HACKERS] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Goran Thyni
11:53 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug David Hartwig
11:54 USE_LOCALE and unsigned char * Andreas Zeugswetter
12:00 AW: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Andreas Zeugswetter
12:09 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) David Hartwig
13:08 Re: AW: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug David Hartwig
13:22 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Tom Lane
13:31 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
13:33 subscribe John Reynolds
13:38 Current snapshot David Hartwig
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] minor problem with detecting int64 in configure Tom Lane
13:54 Re: [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption Thomas G. Lockhart
13:56 Re: [INTERFACES] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Eric Marsden
14:23 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
14:38 Re: [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption Bruce Momjian
14:39 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Bruce Momjian
14:44 Re: [HACKERS] minor problem with detecting int64 in configure Bruce Momjian
15:04 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Brook Milligan
15:47 Re: [INTERFACES] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Jouni Ahto
17:33 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Michael Meskes
17:33 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Michael Meskes
18:19 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
19:00 initdb problems Bruce Momjian
20:43 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Keith Parks
20:52 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Convert PGconn, PGresult to opaque types? Tom Lane
21:03 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Bruce Momjian

25 August 1998

00:01 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Tom Lane
00:21 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Tom Lane
01:52 Re: [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption Thomas G. Lockhart
01:59 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
02:00 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Bruce Momjian
02:09 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Thomas G. Lockhart
02:17 rewrite system and Resdom Bruce Momjian
02:57 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
02:59 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
03:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem Tatsuo Ishii
03:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: new MB patch and pg_type oid problem Bruce Momjian
03:53 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
04:02 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
05:06 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
05:21 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
05:31 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
06:05 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Tatsuo Ishii
07:55 Portability bug in genbki.sh --> initdb hangup Andreas Zeugswetter
08:10 Re[2]: [GENERAL] DELETE statement DOESN'T WORK ANYMORE Sferacarta Software
08:59 vacuum problem Tatsuo Ishii
10:00 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Michael Meskes
10:00 ECPG patches Michael Meskes
10:55 Re: [HACKERS] ECPG patches The Hermit Hacker
13:53 postmaster switches Andreas Zeugswetter
14:12 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
14:27 DATABASE CORRUPTION Sferacarta Software
14:28 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
16:04 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Michael Meskes
16:30 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Bruce Momjian
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
16:32 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
16:35 Re: incomplete snapshot file Peter T Mount
16:36 Re: [HACKERS] Portability bug in genbki.sh --> initdb hangup Bruce Momjian
16:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re[2]: [GENERAL] DELETE statement DOESN'T WORK ANYMORE Bruce Momjian
16:45 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
16:55 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
17:19 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Keith Parks
19:57 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Nick Bastin
20:11 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Keith Parks
20:42 Re: Current snapshot The Hermit Hacker
20:42 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items The Hermit Hacker
23:18 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Henry B. Hotz

26 August 1998

02:05 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
02:18 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Bruce Momjian
02:45 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items The Hermit Hacker
03:56 Massimo patches Bruce Momjian
03:56 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Bruce Momjian
03:57 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items] Bruce Momjian
06:05 AW: [HACKERS] Massimo patches Andreas Zeugswetter
07:32 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Greg Black
08:20 TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
08:35 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:54 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
11:57 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Thomas G. Lockhart
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Michael Meskes
12:32 Re: [HACKERS] Massimo patches Michael Meskes
12:42 Re: [HACKERS] Massimo patches Michael Meskes
12:50 initdb problem with cvs Oleg Bartunov
13:42 getopts include? Magnus Hagander
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished David Hartwig
15:13 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Keith Parks
15:14 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Keith Parks
15:19 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Bruce Momjian
15:31 Re: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) Bruce Momjian
15:34 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Bruce Momjian
15:37 Re: [HACKERS] Massimo patches Bruce Momjian
15:37 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
15:44 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems Bruce Momjian
15:47 Re: [HACKERS] getopts include? Bruce Momjian
15:52 Re: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) The Hermit Hacker
16:09 Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export Edmund Mergl
16:16 RE: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) Jackson, DeJuan
16:21 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished Bruce Momjian
16:50 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) David Hartwig
17:05 Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export Bruce Momjian
17:26 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) Tom Lane
17:29 EMail Problems Peter T Mount
18:21 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) David Hartwig
18:32 pg_attribute typo?? Keith Parks
19:46 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
22:38 Problem with Solaris 2.5.1 Renato A de O Mattosinho

27 August 1998

00:04 Re: pg_attribute typo?? Bruce Momjian
00:31 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian
02:04 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Greg Black
02:28 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Thomas G. Lockhart
03:35 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian
03:45 Re: [HACKERS] getopts include? Michael Meskes
04:12 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
04:12 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
04:18 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tatsuo Ishii
04:36 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian
05:12 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tatsuo Ishii
06:05 AW: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) Andreas Zeugswetter
07:38 Error in postgres server Paul Bagyenda
10:48 libpgtcl and Tcl 8.0 Horak Daniel
12:22 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and Tcl 8.0 Tom Lane
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Thomas G. Lockhart
12:49 Re: [PATCHES] Re: some patches Massimo Dal Zotto
16:01 Re: AW: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) Bruce Momjian
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
16:59 Still getting ERROR: fmgr_info: function 28261: cache lookup faile Michael Meskes
19:34 Re: AW: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
19:51 Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
20:45 FOREIGN KEY revisited Matthew N. Dodd
20:50 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Keith Parks
23:15 unsubscribe jb

28 August 1998

00:30 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
02:20 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
02:37 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem Bruce Momjian
02:49 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
03:56 list macro names Bruce Momjian
03:58 initdb/vacuum fixes Bruce Momjian
03:59 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian
04:01 Re: [HACKERS] Still getting ERROR: fmgr_info: function 28261: cache lookup faile Bruce Momjian
04:30 regression failures Bruce Momjian
04:52 Re: [HACKERS] regression failures jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] list macro names Thomas G. Lockhart
05:46 Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY revisited Thomas G. Lockhart
05:58 Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY revisited Matthew N. Dodd
06:34 Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY revisited Vadim Mikheev
06:38 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
08:07 AW: AW: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser) Andreas Zeugswetter
09:28 long long int and printf format for int8.c Andreas Zeugswetter
09:33 New problem Michael Meskes
10:14 minor patch Massimo Dal Zotto
12:50 Re: [PATCHES] minor patch Bruce Momjian
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] minor patch Bruce Momjian
12:59 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Thomas G. Lockhart
13:05 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and Tcl 8.0 Tom Lane
13:19 Re: [HACKERS] regression failures] Bruce Momjian
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] long long int and printf format for int8.c Thomas G. Lockhart
13:25 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian
13:54 tcl incompatabilities Brook Milligan
16:13 Re: [HACKERS] list macro names dg@informix.com (David Gould)
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] Still getting ERROR: fmgr_info: function 28261: cache lookup faile Michael Meskes
16:34 ecpg patches Michael Meskes
16:47 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg patches The Hermit Hacker
20:11 Re: strange path through code (initdb problem) Keith Parks
22:25 Re: strange path through code (initdb problem) Bruce Momjian

29 August 1998

01:13 Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export Bruce Momjian
01:17 Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export Bruce Momjian
01:37 Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Bruce Momjian
01:55 Re: AW: [HACKERS] sequence creation Bruce Momjian
01:57 Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Bruce Momjian
01:57 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
02:45 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
03:01 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Bruce Momjian
03:02 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug Bruce Momjian
03:09 Re: [HACKERS] Segmentation fault with lo_export Bruce Momjian
03:15 Re: [PATCHES] Re: some patches Bruce Momjian
03:24 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Bruce Momjian
03:26 Re: [HACKERS] list macro names Bruce Momjian
03:42 Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
03:42 IP data type Bruce Momjian
04:00 IP data type/ip_and_mac/cidr Bruce Momjian
04:56 New DEV FAQ item Bruce Momjian
07:42 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Greg Black
09:36 Re: [HACKERS] IP data type darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
13:53 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Tatsuo Ishii
14:06 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Thomas G. Lockhart
15:14 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Thomas G. Lockhart
15:19 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Thomas G. Lockhart
16:22 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Bruce Momjian
16:37 Re: [HACKERS] IP data type Bruce Momjian
17:06 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
17:09 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian
17:16 Re: PostgreSQL under BSD/OS Bruce Momjian
17:29 Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
17:40 new DEV FAQ item Bruce Momjian
17:41 COPY file descriptor leak Bruce Momjian
18:45 jdbc changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
18:49 Re: jdbc changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
20:07 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas A. Szybist
20:19 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
20:38 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Thomas G. Lockhart
21:02 6.4 HISTORY file Bruce Momjian
21:26 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas A. Szybist
22:28 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
23:17 Documentation updates for 6.4 Bruce Momjian
23:17 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
23:18 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem Bruce Momjian

30 August 1998

00:44 Release 6.4 Bruce Momjian
01:22 Documentation fix Marc Howard Zuckman
02:17 Re: [HACKERS] Documentation fix Bruce Momjian
02:23 upgrading to 6.4 from 6.3 Bruce Momjian
02:40 Re: [PATCHES] with tcl/perl patch Bruce Momjian
04:10 new pg_upgrade command Bruce Momjian
04:42 flock patch breaks things here Tom Lane
05:28 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Tom
10:09 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Peter T Mount
10:09 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Peter T Mount
10:09 Re: jdbc changes in 6.4 Peter T Mount
10:10 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Massimo Dal Zotto
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Bruce Momjian
12:17 pgindent for Monday Bruce Momjian
13:05 Re: [HACKERS] pgindent for Monday Peter T Mount
14:25 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Tom Lane
15:06 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Hartwig
15:09 updated contrib modules Massimo Dal Zotto
15:09 bug + patch Massimo Dal Zotto
15:23 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Massimo Dal Zotto
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] pgindent for Monday Bruce Momjian
15:52 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Tom Lane
16:18 Problems with lo_unlink Carlos J. Garcia Orellana
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 HISTORY file Michael Meskes
17:33 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
18:16 Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 The Hermit Hacker
18:22 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here The Hermit Hacker
18:23 Re: [HACKERS] pgindent for Monday The Hermit Hacker
18:38 manpages Massimo Dal Zotto
18:49 Re: [HACKERS] pgindent for Monday Massimo Dal Zotto
18:57 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas A. Szybist
19:23 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas G. Lockhart
20:01 Re: [HACKERS] pgindent for Monday Peter T Mount
20:30 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Bruce Momjian
21:33 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
21:59 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items Thomas G. Lockhart
22:01 Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
22:25 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
22:26 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
23:17 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. David Hartwig

31 August 1998

00:00 Re: [HACKERS] Release 6.4 The Hermit Hacker
00:12 Re: [HACKERS] upgrading to 6.4 from 6.3 Vadim Mikheev
01:34 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Tom Lane
01:46 Anyone else seeing coredumps in pgdump? Tom Lane
03:32 encoding problem Bruce Momjian
03:37 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Bruce Momjian
03:39 Re: Possible bug from 6.3.2t Bruce Momjian
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] upgrading to 6.4 from 6.3 Bruce Momjian
03:50 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
04:00 items for cleanup Bruce Momjian
04:00 other changes Bruce Momjian
04:04 Re: [HACKERS] encoding problem Tatsuo Ishii
05:40 Re: [HACKERS] encoding problem Tatsuo Ishii
05:47 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Tatsuo Ishii
06:00 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Sbragion Denis
06:51 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
06:58 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output? Bruce Momjian
07:14 Re: [HACKERS] other changes dg@informix.com (David Gould)
07:23 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here dg@informix.com (David Gould)
08:15 LinuxPPC problems Tatsuo Ishii
09:02 Strange NOTICE Michael Meskes
09:23 AW: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Andreas Zeugswetter
10:42 UNION opration NOT return all result set :) pls help korapat
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here The Hermit Hacker
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Tom Lane
14:10 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Brook Milligan
14:49 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas A. Szybist
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] other changes Bruce Momjian
16:03 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
16:04 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Bruce Momjian
16:10 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Bruce Momjian
16:21 TPRINTF in trace.h Andreas Zeugswetter
16:39 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Thomas A. Szybist
16:49 Re: [HACKERS] TPRINTF in trace.h Bruce Momjian
16:49 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Bruce Momjian
16:50 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here dg@informix.com (David Gould)
17:32 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Bruce Momjian
19:52 Re: [HACKERS] TPRINTF in trace.h Massimo Dal Zotto
20:05 Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here Massimo Dal Zotto
20:08 JDBC Update Peter T Mount
20:26 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. Keith Parks
20:39 AIX Port Strangness David Hartwig
21:32 2 Troubles with (current) pgsql 6.4 Michael Reifenberger