>
> >Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
> >
> >I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> >namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
> >
> >However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> >object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
> >things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
> >
> >Is is OK to rename them internally?
>
> How about giving them their own subdirectory large_object/_lob_###,
> then there would be no naming conflict ?
> Since all others call them LOB I would use _lob_### instead.
That would be interesting.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
