Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 July 1998

• 11:23   ... wward
• 12:53   DBD-Pg is broken from Jun 20 snapshot ? Oleg Bartunov
• 13:13   DB-shell connect Gregory Holston
• 13:35   Permissions for create view Oleg Bartunov
• 14:05   Re: your mail The Hermit Hacker
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] DB-shell connect Bruce Momjian
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] DB-shell connect 
• 15:40   Re: [HACKERS] DB-shell connect Tom Lane

2 July 1998

• 20:45   no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? De Clarke
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? The Hermit Hacker

3 July 1998

• 00:23   Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? Tom Lane
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 00:50   Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? Tom Lane
• 01:33   implementing outer joins Brett McCormick
• 01:49   RE: [HACKERS] implementing outer joins Stupor Genius
• 02:22   you are lost in a maze of twisting code, all alike Brett McCormick
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] implementing outer joins Bruce Momjian
• 03:14   RE: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to bu Roman Volkoff
• 03:30   Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 06:51   Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? Maarten Boekhold
• 08:31   are BLOBs deleted that are not referenced? David Wetzel
• 09:19   Access & Postgres Sferacarta Software
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 roberto@mha.com.br (Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia)
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Tom Lane
• 15:22   RE: [HACKERS] Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Magnus Hagander
• 19:09   MySQL and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian

4 July 1998

• 23:01   Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system Bruce Momjian
• 23:31   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian

5 July 1998

• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] are BLOBs deleted that are not referenced? Peter T Mount
• 10:30   JDBC Driver Development Hitch Peter T Mount
• 15:06   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Tom Lane

6 July 1998

• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian
• 05:16   postgresql snapshot on ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/ David Maclean
• 08:29   Information about user`s procces:username and his sql-request? Alexzander Blashko
• 08:58   Re: [HACKERS] Information about user`s procces:username and his sql-request? Bruce Momjian
• 19:03   New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc Tom Lane
• 21:18   Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Tom Lane

7 July 1998

• 11:58   Re: Need your comments/help The Hermit Hacker
• 14:09   Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Bruce Momjian
• 19:58   Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Bruce Momjian
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Brett McCormick
• 22:00   Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Tom Lane
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool Henry B. Hotz

8 July 1998

• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Thomas G. Lockhart
• 06:37   PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Dr. Armin Schloesser
• 07:34   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Dr. Michael Meskes
• 11:27   Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? Herouth Maoz
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:26   Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane

9 July 1998

• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list ocie@paracel.com
• 02:32   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Bruce Momjian
• 03:35   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:42   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:38   Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:14   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Armin Schloesser
• 06:08   Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Oliver Elphick
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:24   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:44   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres David Hartwig
• 12:57   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Armin Schloesser
• 13:13   InitPostgres() fails through libpq Egon Schmid
• 13:19   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Maarten Boekhold
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Dr. Michael Meskes
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Tom
• 17:22   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom
• 17:41   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 18:17   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Massimo Dal Zotto

10 July 1998

• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:20   Constraints in PostgreSQL David Maclean
• 05:25   Leaving for vacation Dr. Michael Meskes
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] Constraints in PostgreSQL Vadim Mikheev
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] Leaving for vacation The Hermit Hacker

11 July 1998

• 12:49   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart

12 July 1998

• 12:34   db/dbm-emulation Goran Thyni
• 21:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patcht Bruce Momjian

13 July 1998

• 02:00   atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 08:10   subscribe dlibenzi@maticad.it (Davide Libenzi)
• 12:00   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change David Hartwig
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tom Lane
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 13:01   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 13:14   HPUX Port dlibenzi@maticad.it (Davide Libenzi)
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port The Hermit Hacker
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Problems with your patch (Sorry). Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: [BUGS] SQL optimisation dead loop Bruce Momjian
• 19:30   Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Tom Lane
• 19:53   Anyone working on optimizing subset min/max queries? Tom Lane
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone working on optimizing subset min/max queries? Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: [GENERAL] more nodeError problems and general view failures! Bruce Momjian
• 23:44   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port The Hermit Hacker

14 July 1998

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Tom Lane
• 02:00   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Brandon Ibach
• 03:08   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 03:35   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 03:56   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 03:58   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 07:18   AW: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Andreas Zeugswetter
• 10:05   Q about read committed in Oracle... Vadim Mikheev
• 10:15   Q about read committed in Oracle... Vadim Mikheev
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Vince Vielhaber
• 12:28   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port The Hermit Hacker
• 12:32   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:43   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 12:44   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recent updates [to union] Andreas Zeugswetter
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:06   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change] Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 17:21   EXPLAIN doesn't explain operations on inheritance trees Tom Lane
• 19:36   SEQUENCES and COPY FROM Mike Embry
• 21:33   "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Tom Lane
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() dg@illustra.com (David Gould)

15 July 1998

• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] SEQUENCES and COPY FROM Vadim Mikheev
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   FW: MaxQuery Plan Dirk Elmendorf
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Vadim Mikheev
• 02:18   Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Vadim Mikheev
• 02:46   two records with same oid, freak accident? Brett McCormick
• 02:54   more on phantom record Brett McCormick
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Bruce Momjian
• 09:04   Re: [INTERFACES][HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Herouth Maoz
• 12:09   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:45   Re: [INTERFACES][HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN doesn't explain operations on inheritance trees Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 15:20   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:31   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   AW: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Andreas Zeugswetter
• 16:00   Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart
• 16:04   Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian
• 16:55   Re: AW: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Vadim Mikheev
• 17:41   Current sources dump core on COPY IN/OUT Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] Current sources dump core on COPY IN/OUT Bruce Momjian
• 18:48   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing
• 19:24   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 19:27   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Vadim Mikheev
• 19:39   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 19:57   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Hartwig
• 20:02   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 20:25   ... **Bull*sEye*
• 21:57   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Hartwig
• 22:47   proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev
• 23:01   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian

16 July 1998

• 00:30   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   ... **Bull*sEye*
• 06:45   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Maarten Boekhold
• 07:06   [BUG?] strange PQgetisnull Park, Chul-Su
• 07:26   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing
• 07:40   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing
• 07:53   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Vadim Mikheev
• 09:36   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Aleksey Dashevsky
• 09:52   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing
• 12:29   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 12:43   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] [BUG?] strange PQgetisnull Tom Lane
• 14:48   Large objects buffer leak 
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] [BUG?] strange PQgetisnull Bruce Momjian
• 14:51   [QUESTIONS] slow "select lo_unlink(..) where ...;" ? Park, Chul-Su
• 14:52   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? ocie@paracel.com
• 17:30   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 17:39   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian
• 17:42   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Peter T Mount
• 17:43   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Peter T Mount

17 July 1998

• 00:37   aborting create table in the middle of process t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 03:22   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian
• 06:17   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing
• 07:59   using C++ to define new functions David Gross
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian

18 July 1998

• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h problem on S/Linux Bruce Momjian
• 13:51   Rel structure renamed Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc Bruce Momjian
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] two records with same oid, freak accident? Massimo Dal Zotto
• 19:00   Change to psql and MB Bruce Momjian

19 July 1998

• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7 port (corrected intro text). Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Bruce Momjian
• 03:34   Re: AW: [HACKERS] regular expressions from hell Bruce Momjian
• 04:49   Re: Having Patch (against v6.3.2) Bruce Momjian
• 08:30   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h problem on S/Linux Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 08:46   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h problem on S/Linux Bruce Momjian
• 09:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Having Patch (against v6.3.2) Bruce Momjian
• 09:06   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Having Patch (against v6.3.2) Bruce Momjian
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] ipaddr data type - EXTENDED VERSION HERE] Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 09:30   Removal of recipe/tioga/Tee node Bruce Momjian
• 10:40   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] ipaddr data type - EXTENDED VERSION HERE] Alex P. Rudnev
• 10:40   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] ipaddr data type - EXTENDED VERSION HERE] Alex P. Rudnev
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Removal of recipe/tioga/Tee node Matthew N. Dodd
• 16:00   Mariposa Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Removal of recipe/tioga/Tee node Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   pqReadData() Egon Schmid
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] Removal of recipe/tioga/Tee node Matthew N. Dodd
• 18:00   Re: [HACKERS] Removal of recipe/tioga/Tee node Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] pqReadData() Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: full text indexing for PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 18:27   cidr Paul A Vixie
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] using C++ to define new functions Michal Mosiewicz

20 July 1998

• 02:29   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev
• 04:00   Name type vs. char * Bruce Momjian
• 08:37   Re: [HACKERS] Name type vs. char * Bruce Momjian
• 09:08   Large Objects buffer leak patch(es) 
• 12:22   Finding primary keys in a table darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] using C++ to define new functions Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: [GENERAL] Recalling previous commands at the PSQL prompt Gene Selkov, Jr.
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Finding primary keys in a table Bruce Momjian
• 16:05   exec_tlist_length Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   s_lock.h busted Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h busted Bruce Momjian
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] Finding primary keys in a table darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h busted dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 18:19   Re: [HACKERS] Finding primary keys in a table Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h busted Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? David Hartwig
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?t Bruce Momjian
• 19:45   cvs and empty directories Bruce Momjian
• 19:52   Re: exec_tlist_length Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] s_lock.h problem on S/Linux Keith Parks
• 20:28   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 20:45   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 22:56   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] cvs and empty directories The Hermit Hacker

21 July 1998

• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] Finding primary keys in a table Thomas G. Lockhart
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 02:06   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 02:18   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 02:20   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Matthew N. Dodd
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 03:18   Re: Large Objects buffer leak patch(es) Bruce Momjian
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 03:51   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 03:59   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 04:06   README files Bruce Momjian
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 04:15   [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] Thomas G. Lockhart
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] Bruce Momjian
• 05:31   next XID is in shmem now... Vadim Mikheev
• 05:44   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 09:12   Re: [HACKERS] Finding primary keys in a table Hannu Krosing
• 10:59   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 11:06   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] The Hermit Hacker
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 12:33   Re: [HACKERS] Finding primary keys in a table darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Matthew N. Dodd
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now... Bruce Momjian
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Nick Bastin
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Vince Vielhaber
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   Re: Complexity of contrib types Hannu Krosing
• 14:10   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian
• 14:12   Re: Complexity of contrib types Bruce Momjian
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] cvs and empty directories Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Complexity of contrib types Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: Complexity of contrib types Hannu Krosing
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] cidr' Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: Complexity of contrib types Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: Complexity of contrib types Hannu Krosing
• 15:07   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 15:27   Re: Linux Oracle! (fwd) Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev
• 15:36   Re: Complexity of contrib types Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now... Vadim Mikheev
• 15:41   Hey Linux People (OT) Vince Vielhaber
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now... Bruce Momjian
• 18:13   Re: Oracle on Linux Hannu Krosing
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Vince Vielhaber
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian

22 July 1998

• 01:44   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 03:35   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Hal Snyder
• 04:24   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 13:42   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Thomas G. Lockhart
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Documentation Roadmap Thomas G. Lockhart
• 15:02   Re: Documentation Roadmap Bruce Momjian
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] cidr The Hermit Hacker
• 15:54   Jim Gray's Benchmark Handbook Online bbutler33@hotmail.com (Brian Butler)
• 15:56   performance book Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tom Lane
• 22:17   Efficiency again... Michael Richards

23 July 1998

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency again... Bruce Momjian
• 01:04   subselects & views Brett McCormick
• 02:50   LLL: serialized and schema objects... Vadim Mikheev
• 03:33   Unsubscribing J. Eric Thompson
• 04:05   I18N support in InterBase t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] LLL: serialized and schema objects... David Maclean
• 05:40   Re: [HACKERS] I18N support in InterBase Bruce Momjian
• 05:59   Re: [HACKERS] LLL: serialized and schema objects... Vadim Mikheev
• 11:45   datetime ?#!!??@ dlibenzi@maticad.it (Davide Libenzi)
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] datetime ?#!!??@ Tom Lane
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 13:36   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] datetime ?#!!??@ Bruce Momjian
• 15:56   Re: [GENERAL] datetime ?#!!??@ dlibenzi@maticad.it (Davide Libenzi)
• 16:02   ODBC and palloc ... dlibenzi@maticad.it (Davide Libenzi)
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] ODBC and palloc ... Byron Nikolaidis
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] ODBC and palloc ... dlibenzi@maticad.it (Davide Libenzi)
• 18:02   Between broken? Vince Vielhaber
• 18:22   Re: [HACKERS] ODBC and palloc ... Byron Nikolaidis
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] ODBC and palloc ... Bruce Momjian
• 19:29   pointers Gregory Holston
• 23:45   Between -- update Vince Vielhaber

24 July 1998

• 01:56   limitaion of PostgreSQL t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 02:38   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 04:38   CIDR type Brandon Ibach
• 06:31   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Paul A Vixie
• 10:52   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 10:57   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] cidr Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Query plan affected by lack of explicit cast? Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 18:15   Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y Bruce Momjian
• 19:20   Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y Bruce Tong
• 23:18   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC Driver -- Access Order By problem solved!!! Bruce Momjian

25 July 1998

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC Driver -- Access Order By problem solved!!! Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC Driver -- Access Order By problem solved!!! Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC Driver -- Access Order By problem solved!!! Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] cidr darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 11:00   Compile of recent CVS fails Egon Schmid
• 12:32   Re: [GENERAL] BLOBs Peter T Mount
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] Compile of recent CVS fails t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 18:21   current snapshot Edmund Mergl
• 18:53   compilation of current snapshot dies Edmund Mergl
• 19:56   current snapshot Edmund Mergl
• 22:38   Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Tom Lane

26 July 1998

• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot Bruce Momjian
• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] compilation of current snapshot dies Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
• 02:38   Additional UnixWare 7 patches for latest snapshot. Billy G. Allie
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot The Hermit Hacker
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot Egon Schmid
• 05:06   Possible bug in sort/sort question Michael Richards
• 12:17   ... Cyril VELTER
• 14:00   Vacuuming an index takes way too long Tom Lane
• 14:10   Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names Maarten Boekhold
• 20:19   Proposed cleanup of libpq's use of stderr Tom Lane

27 July 1998

• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot The Hermit Hacker
• 05:44   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Thomas G. Lockhart
• 05:51   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 07:40   Re: hackers-digest V1 #894 Hannu Krosing
• 09:59   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot Peter T Mount
• 10:45   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot The Hermit Hacker
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot Peter T Mount
• 14:05   OR clause issues Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   6.1 pg_dump core dump bower@image.Kodak.COM (J Christopher Bower)
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause issues Vadim Mikheev
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] Hey Linux People (OT) Dr. Michael Meskes
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Dr. Michael Meskes
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Dr. Michael Meskes
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Linux Oracle! (fwd) Dr. Michael Meskes
• 19:32   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Vadim Mikheev
• 23:10   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Tom Lane

28 July 1998

• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot t-ishii@sra.co.jp
• 01:59   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Vadim Mikheev
• 09:07   Re: [HACKERS] current snapshot Peter T Mount
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Tom Lane
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 pg_dump core dump Tom Lane
• 16:23   Coping with backend crash in libpq Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: [INTERFACES] Coping with backend crash in libpq Karl Denninger
• 18:50   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Dr. Michael Meskes
• 18:51   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Dr. Michael Meskes

29 July 1998

• 00:17   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Vadim Mikheev
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] Coping with backend crash in libpq Bruce Momjian
• 09:22   Re: [HACKERS] Coping with backend crash in libpq dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 13:17   ... Robert Nosko
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Tom Lane
• 13:51   Informix on Linux Thomas G. Lockhart
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] Coping with backend crash in libpq Tom Lane
• 14:04   Problem with CVS access to current sources ernst.molitor@uni-bonn.de
• 14:14   AW: [HACKERS] Informix on Linux Andreas Zeugswetter
• 14:58   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with CVS access to current sources Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 15:33   Re: [HACKERS] Informix on Linux dg@illustra.com (David Gould)

30 July 1998

• 00:17   Re: [HACKERS] Bogus "Non-functional update" notices Vadim Mikheev
• 07:40   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Vadim Mikheev
• 08:33   AW: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Andreas Zeugswetter
• 09:15   CVS Problem holding up JDBC work Peter T Mount
• 17:28   proposals for LLL, part 2 (locking) Vadim Mikheev
• 17:50   ANON-CVS... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Dr. Michael Meskes
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle... Dr. Michael Meskes
• 22:53   join problems: FATAL 1: palloc failure: memory exhausted Oleg Bartunov
• 23:41   Re: [HACKERS] join problems: FATAL 1: palloc failure: memory exhausted Vadim Mikheev

31 July 1998

• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] join problems: FATAL 1: palloc failure: memory exhausted Bruce Momjian
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] join problems: FATAL 1: palloc failure: memory exhausted Bruce Momjian
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] join problems: FATAL 1: palloc failure: memory exhausted Oleg Bartunov
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] join problems: FATAL 1: palloc failure: memory exhausted Vadim Mikheev
• 01:38   Re: [INTERFACES] psqlodbc Thomas G. Lockhart
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 2 (locking) Vadim Mikheev
• 04:32   OR clause status report Bruce Momjian
• 04:49   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 07:06   ... Andreas Zeugswetter
• 07:53   AW: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Andreas Zeugswetter
• 08:09   Re: AW: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 11:54   RE: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vince Vielhaber
• 12:27   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vince Vielhaber
• 12:48   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vince Vielhaber
• 13:06   Re: AW: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Bruce Momjian
• 13:33   Re: AW: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Bruce Momjian
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Bruce Momjian
• 14:23   displaying debug info Bruce Momjian
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vadim Mikheev
• 15:08   Dropping tables... Vadim Mikheev
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report Vince Vielhaber
• 17:20   Re: postgreSQL foreign key constraint Thomas Lockhart
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working Vince Vielhaber
• 18:23   User authentication bug? Maarten Boekhold
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Bruce Momjian
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] User authentication bug? Maarten Boekhold