Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter T Mount
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.980716182806.1202S-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4  (David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, David Hartwig wrote:

> This is really big for the ODBCers. (And I suspect for JDBCers too.)  Many
> desktop libraries and end-user tools depend on this "record set" strategy to
> operate effectively.

Although I haven't seen what they produce, it is possible that JBuilder
and others do have this affect with JDBC.

However, not all JDBC applications have this problem. Infact the majority
I've seen only produce much simpler queries.

--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk or petermount@earthling.net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4
Next
From: t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Date:
Subject: aborting create table in the middle of process