Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.3.95q.980709104630.27458B-100000@misery.sdf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Some items for the TODO list  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> Things I'd like to see get in there before 6.4:
>
> 1. On HPUX, the new no-exec method of starting the backend means that
> all the backends claim to be "postmaster"; there's no way to tell 'em
> apart via ps(1).  There is some code in postgres.c that tries to update
> the process title information by tweaking the original argv[] array, but
> that just plain doesn't work under HPUX, nor under quite a few other
> Unix variants.  I'm finding out that not being able to tell which
> process is which is a real pain in the neck; I don't think it will be
> acceptable for production use.  I think we are going to have to bite the
> bullet and borrow the process-title-setting code from sendmail --- I
> know it's ugly, but it *works* on many many Unixes.

  Many UNIXes have a setproctitle() function, either in libc or libutil.
I think a native function should be used if exists.

Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list