Re: Complexity of contrib types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Complexity of contrib types
Date
Msg-id 199807211636.MAA00440@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Complexity of contrib types  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >
> > We could create a function that returned the previously inserted oid,
> > and use that in the next query.
> >
> >         insert into test values (4);
> >         update test3 set val = lastoid();
> >
> > Just remember the lastoid inserted in the backend code.  Seems easy.  Do
> > you want it added to the TODO list.
>
> Yes. It could be used in several places.
>
> But I'm currently not aware about the future of oid's 'at the large'.
>
> I have understood that we are on a way of getting rid of OIDs for
> non-system tables (and having to re-implement them using triggers
> and sequences where/when needed)?

OIDs are in SQL-92(?), so we will have to keep them.  I believe we may
someday make them optional on user tables.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...